VSO Software Forum

perika wrote: ↑Sun Mar 27, 2022 10:40 pm version 4 for me is the best

Where is such a "version 4" available for download?

Current "release" is still 3.0.0.71 as it has been for years. Same on home product page.

So what is this about "version 4"??

There's a happy ending to this story (and it has nothing to do with VSO's ConvertXtoHD product, which since it doesn't do what I had hoped it would thereby failed its trial period with me, and has long since been uninstalled from my system and never purchased). Turns out after all my unsuccessful st...

My guess is that the audio tracks as presented by CXtoHD are in the exact same order as shown by MediaInfo. Unfortunately the "ID" shown by MediaInfo isn't presented by CXtoHD, but surely it must be exactly the same sequence. MediaInfo also shows the actual unique PID for the separate audi...

Your HD is very fragmented or has bad sectors if you can watch the movies on your PC but cannot watch them from the burned blurays/DVDs. Individually each source video is easily playable. It's just one video file, and is rendered by the software media player without a problem. What he's trying to d...

The "memory leak" bug specifically in REMUX-MODE has now been fixed with 3.0.0.74. I don't know if it also was present when you requested RE-ENCODING of audio/video instead of REMUX-MODE, but it definitely was present in REMUX-MODE. There are other problems with 3.0.0.74 again running in R...

The original purpose of this thread was to ask for help with the fact that CXtoHD 3.0.0.73 was failing to complete when running in REMUX-ONLY mode (i.e. direct copy of both audio and video from input to output, simply remuxing from MP4 input to M2TS output), producing a "running low on memory&q...

I have been able to use another BluRay creator product successfully, to accomplish a similar REMUX-ONLY mode conversion (again, just using one input MP4 file). The program I used was AVCHDCoder. Obviously the titling and main menu of AVCHDCoder is different than that produced by CXtoHD, so the total...

NOTE: even though in theory, the AUDIO setting option to force re-encoding to EAC-3 has been checked, I do not believe any re-encoding is actually occurring at all!! And this must be because the input audio is discovered to already be EAC-3, so that no actual re-encoding is required. And yet, the cr...

Since the "memory leak" I reported with 3.0.0.73 running in REMUX-ONLY mode has now been fixed in 3.0.0.74, I am starting a new thread to describe the new defect symptom produced by 3.0.0.74 running in REMUX-ONLY mode: "NO AUDIBLE AUDIO". This defect from 3.0.0.74 running in REMU...

Status update on my open ticket: It IS definitely being worked on by the development team. I've received several emails from VSO confirming this, as well as confirming that they have received all of the files I've sent them in order to be able to duplicate my own results and symptoms when using 3.0....

Hi, I was wondering if there was a reason for this Anytime I burn a Blu-ray some films are unwatchable. They are totally jittery and glitchy - and in no way watchable. They are 'slightly' messed up. Why? The files play perfectly on the PC. My guess is that you're using a real assortment of unusual ...

What do your LOGs for the two experiments show, for video and audio processing? The log indicates whether your audio was either: (a) determined to be compliant and resulted in a REMUX-ONLY raw copy of audio for the conversion to BluRay, or (b) was determined to be non-compliant and resulted in a RE-...

You could be seeing a symptom that is similar to the set of problematic symptoms I saw in my own tests, when giving 3.0.0.74 a try. My results were reported on my own separate thread, originally created to report a "memory leak" bug. This problem HAS in fact seemingly been fixed by 3.0.0.7...

I happened to notice that there is a new latest 3.0.0.74 beta posted today. So this must be the new version promised 10 days ago. It would have been helpful if this information had been posted here in this thread as well, since the only "fix" in the new beta version is precisely dealing wi...

Terrific news!! Many thanks for your prompt response to the report of this issue, and for your quick resolution. From a user perspective I'd like to say that my appreciation for this kind of "parental" vendor behavior toward problem reports cannot be overstated. Well done. Looking forward ...

@Nemesh, I've sent you a PM with the URL so that you can download my files: (1) Shorter MP4, 51 minutes vs. 1:19. (2) Resulting ISO output (of BluRay folder) from XtoHD job processing this shorter MP4 file. (3) Job log from the run, proving "success" using the same original program setting...

You are using a mkv and NOT a Blu-Ray structure. So the settings you are using do NOT apply. Respectfully, and supported by empirical evidence, I would like to disagree. See my details below. I believe my settings support exactly what I'm trying to accomplish, and which I believe the XtoHD program ...

You are using a mkv and NOT a Blu-Ray structure. So the settings you are using do NOT apply. I was using an MP4, not MKV. Underlying content MPEG-4. Is this what you mean? What is the relevant fact here? I am still learning, so pardon my ignorance. I used to use a program named multiAVCHD to accomp...

NOTE: at the start of the process, log shows "memory load 27%, available memory 3564MB" on my 32GB machine. Strangely, the log on my 16GB machine shows "memory load 46%, available memory 3528MB". I don't know what "available memory" is intended to imply, but it's unexpe...

Well, I tried using @nemesh's "automatic" setting but actually the rest of his setup involved ENCODING. When I started the test the CPU needle went up near 100% and progress was slow. I'm not interested in any transcoding or re-compression at all.I want absolutely 100% original quality on ...